The rural public rights don't abuse whose house

In the countryside, whose house is by the public http://www.wow77.com/ (wow gold) rights caused by the intervention group incidents. This must be much attention and widespread concern.

Along with the urbanization, industrialization process accelerating, like "city whose house is same, whose house is in rural speed stage. In recent years, the practice of urban land expropriation of perfecting the laws and regulations, the law is clear, the relationship between public rights group incidents caused by the intervention, less and less people more http://www.flywowgold.com/ (wow gold) and more high satisfaction. But rural land expropriation of the laws and regulations are not perfect and legal relationship is not very clear. Especially the position is not science, public rights abuse frequently occurred, the people and government of the conflict between the more sharp and contradictions become more prominent.

The cause of the public rights abuse, mainly is quite the dislocation of the government's role in the place, the government shouldn't do things should do. The performance of the abuse of public rights DuoZhong varied. For example, in many whose house, a start of the actual government is to be demolished, and talking about compensation, the http://www.85wowgold.com/ (wow gold) government and a link to the interests of the negotiator, when both sides a contradiction of the conflict, even when the government and have become events facilitators and judge. In the public right and the right to privacy, is the game of "athletes," "the referee" is the government is easy to lose the fair, so it is not easy to take all the, this is one; Second, some government functional departments and personnel legal consciousness is not strong, the weakening of the sense, in order to gain,'t hesitate to use common power for interested parties to escort, cause the vital interests of the enroach on, also make the government involved in conflict, became the opposite of the spiral.

The harm of public rights abuse is obvious. On one hand, infringe upon the lawful rights and interests of the masses, and damages the party-mass relationship and relationship between cadre and masses; On the other hand, make conflict, and intensified conflict, the impact of the overall situation, destroy the stable.
The abuse of public rights is essentially the dislocation of the government's role, then to avoid public rights abuse in the final analysis, it is the role of government is a, it needs the law give clear definition. At the moment, the matter is clearly defined what is http://www.wow-gold-team.com/ (wow gold) "public" whose house, what is "business" or "commercial" whose house. And to clear, if in the public interests of the need, the government is of course whose house the dismantler authorized may exercise the mandatory, state power, but in the exercise of the mandatory rights must do the fair justice; If out of sheer business or business needs, the government not only can't whose house as a dismantler and can not use any excuse to public rights involved. At the same time, the demolition and resettlement of dispute, the government should bear the responsibilities of the effective supervision, have the effect of justice.

If I can make it public rights in the exercise of the right to privacy, according to law, protect, I think, whose house is virtuous will rural development track.

On an article: http://junyi0213.blogspot.com/2011/09/rural-urban-house-removing-compensation.html